|
..if someone oppresses, injures, and wrongs another, and the wronged man retaliates, this is vengeance, and is censurable.. If 'Amr dishonours Zaid, the latter has not the right to dishonour 'Amr; if he does so, this is vengeance, and is very reprehensible. No, rather he must return good for evil, and not only forgive, but also, if possible, be of service to his oppressor. This conduct is worthy of man; for what advantage does he gain by vengeance? The two actions are equivalent; if one action is reprehensible, both are reprehensible. The only difference is that one was committed first, the other later
(99:8)
|